Coinbase to face revived lawsuit by customers

Jonathan Stempel
·2 min read

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Friday revived a lawsuit by Coinbase customers who accused the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange of illegally selling unregistered securities and failing to register as a broker-dealer.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said a lower court judge should not have relied on a December 2021 user agreement to find that Coinbase did not hold title to, and was not the seller of, 79 tokens that the customers traded.

In its 3-0 decision, the appeals court said Coinbase had over time materially changed its user agreements, and the December 2021 version was not "conclusive" when evaluating the customers' legal claims.

Customers in the proposed class action also argued that they never accepted that version, making it irrelevant in deciding to dismiss their case.

Friday's decision also upheld the dismissal of claims under the federal Securities Exchange Act seeking to rescind some customer transactions.

The case was returned to U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer in Manhattan, who had dismissed it in February 2023.

In a post on social media platform X, Coinbase's chief legal officer Paul Grewal said the exchange welcomed the dismissal of some claims.

"There's no private liability for the secondary trading of digital assets on exchanges like Coinbase," he wrote. "Why? Because contracts matter."

Jordan Goldstein, a lawyer for the customers, said they were grateful with the decision and plan to resume their case against Coinbase and its Chief Executive Brian Armstrong.

In finding that Coinbase wasn't a seller, Engelmayer had said the exchange had no direct role in transactions, despite having allegedly promoted tokens' "purported value proposition" and distributed free tokens to boost trading volume.

On March 27, U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan denied Coinbase's bid to dismiss a Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit claiming it illegally facilitated the trading of tokens that should have been registered as securities.

The case is Oberlander et al v Coinbase Global Inc et al, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-184.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Aurora Ellis)

Latest Stories

  • Canada's retaliation for Trump tariffs is biggest concern, says Japan's Komatsu

    The top business risk of the Trump presidency for heavy-duty equipment maker Komatsu is not the tariffs he has threatened, but Canada's potential retaliatory duties on American-made mining machines, the head of the Japanese company said. The view of a global manufacturer flags the possible knock-on impact of Trump's pledge for tariffs on imports from Canada, China and Mexico when he takes office, especially if the targets decide to retaliate with trade barriers on their own. Komatsu, the world's second-largest construction machinery company after Caterpillar, earns more than a quarter of its sales from North America and employs about 8,000 staff in the United States.

  • 21 Clueless Bosses Who Should Be Fired From Their Jobs, Like, Immediately

    The most toxic behavior I've ever seen.

  • Lizzo Says Bananenbar Sex Show in Lawsuit Was 'Wild' but 'Everyone Had a Great Time' and Was 'Very Consensual'

    On Thursday, Dec. 19, the "Truth Hurts" singer opened up about the lawsuit she is facing from three ex-dancers on the 'Baby, This Is Keke Palmer' podcast

  • A Canada Post letter carrier delivers mail in Toronto on Tuesday. Selling off or privatizing the postal service is just one of many significant and potentially drastic remedies tossed around by analysts who say the Crown corporation cannot continue in its present form.

    The solution to Canada Post's financial woes and murky future, according to one observer, is just two words: Sell it."I'm not sure you can do any tweaks," said Vincent Geloso, an assistant professor of economics at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va. "The best you can do is make them suck not as bad. That's essentially it. There's no way around that," Geloso, who is also a senior fellow at the Fraser Institute, told CBC News. "It's better if we just go down the route of selling it off."Canada Post's recent labour strife has renewed focus on what changes might have to be made to adapt to the future. Suggestions have included less frequent mail delivery, limiting home delivery and beefing up its parcel mail business.The Canadian Union of Postal Workers has also offered its own solutions of "expanded, innovative services." Those new services would include low-fee postal banking and adapting Canada Post offices to house broadband internet servers for rural and remote areas.But some argue more drastic action is needed, such as selling off or privatizing the Crown corporation.WATCH | Should Canada Post be privatized?Even before the month-long strike by more than 55,000 postal workers, the national mail service had been under the spotlight for its grim financial situation. Back in May, Canada Post said it could run out of operating funds in less than a year.Yet taxpayers are not on the hook for its losses; Canada Post is funded by the sale of postal products and services. Still, it has been losing money since 2018. In the last six years, its losses have totalled $3 billion, including $748 million in 2023.The corporation has blamed this on declining revenue from delivery of letters and parcels, despite an increase in the volume of package deliveries. Meanwhile, the cost of delivering mail and parcels is increasing.Canada Post has also struggled to compete with more privately owned delivery companies.Any other company — facing such losses and declining demand — would be forced to innovate and reduce costs, or would otherwise be bought out or go bankrupt, Geloso said in a recent article in The Globe and Mail.Because of its monopoly over most of the letter market, Canada Post "lacks this incentive," he wrote, and can "simply pass the burden onto consumers by raising prices."Instead, he says that the federal government should look to how some European countries have adapted their postal services.The recent labour strife has renewed focus on the future Canada Post and what changes may have to be made. (Christinne Muschi/The Canadian Press)End postal monopoliesFor example, the European Commission, which is responsible for proposing and monitoring new EU laws and policies, said in 2013 that the delivery of all letters, regardless of weight, was open to competition. (In Canada, only Canada Post can deliver letters.)Such open competition would end monopolies and do more to control costs, Geloso says.But, he says, Ottawa could go further by following the lead of Austria, the Netherlands and Germany, which have privatized their postal operations. Because of the pressures of competition, those national postal services have focused on controlling their costs, he says, the sort of focus "Canada Post will never have as long as it's a Crown corporation with a monopoly."Geloso, however, doesn't mention the U.K.'s Royal Mail, which was privatized in 2013 and has struggled to adapt as the number of people using it continues to decline steeply. (Earlier this week, the U.K. government approved the sale of Royal Mail's parent company to a Czech billionaire.)Despite privatization, the Royal Mail has lost millions of dollars annually and been repeatedly fined by U.K. regulator Ofcom for failing to achieve its delivery targets.The U.K.'s Royal Mail, which was privatized in 2013, has struggled to adapt as the number of people using it continues to decline steeply. (Kirsty Wigglesworth/The Associated Press)Those shortfalls are related to the British government requiring Royal Mail to deliver to more than 30 million U.K. premises, six days a week, says Paul Simmonds, former assistant professor at the Warwick Business School. "This requirement … has long been a major and expensive thorn in Royal Mail's side," Simmonds wrote last year for The Conversation website. Marvin Ryder, an associate professor at the DeGroote School of Business at McMaster University in Hamilton, says privatization of a postal service brings legislation and an oversight group to make sure "your mission as a country is still being accomplished by the post office."The regulations and stream of orders from that group have a significant effect on profit, meaning these privatized postal services make little money, he said.WATCH | What is the future of Canada Post? "Even though these models are tried, it's not clear to me at all that there's one shining example of something that's really brilliant," Ryder said.Ian Lee, an associate professor at Carleton University in Ottawa, who wrote his PhD thesis on the future of Canada Post, says it's difficult to compare Canada with European countries because of the latters' high population density."That changes the economics... that changes everything," he said. "And that's why using European examples doesn't work. It doesn't work because they've got phenomenal densities.""[Those] analogies aren't legitimate because the cost structure of Europe is so radically different because of their densities."Privatization of Canada Post is certainly feasible but it raises questions, including who would want to buy it, Ryder says. The private sector has so far only shown interest in parcel delivery — not letters."So if you want to sell it lock, stock and barrel, who wants to come in and do the other?"

  • “Histrionic” Jay-Z Mocked By Alleged Rape Victim’s Lawyer As Full Of Empty Threats; Case “Total Sham,” Rapper’s Attorney Asserts

    Billionaire Jay-Z is a bully who has “shrilly maintained an entitlement to different rules and faster procedures” against a Jane Doe who claims the ‘Picasso, Baby’ rapper, Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs and an unnamed female celebrity raped her in 2000 when she was 13-years-old, says the accuser’s lawyer in the latest war of words between the …

  • Holiday tax break impact on small businesses

    Nearly a week after the new federal tax break came into effect, small business owners across the country are starting to feel its impact. Small business expert, Beverlee Rasmussen joins Candace Daniel to weigh in on how the tax break has affected owners so far, and what this means for their bottom line.

  • Is TELUS Corporation (TU) the Best Telecom Dividend Stock to Buy for 2024?

    We recently compiled a list of the 10 Best Telecom Dividend Stocks To Buy for 2024. In this article, we are going to take a look at where TELUS Corporation (NYSE:TU) stands against the other telecom dividend stocks. The telecommunications sector plays a vital role in the United States, attracting considerable interest from investors due to […]

  • Trailer settlement near Yellowknife focus of land rights battle

    A small cluster of trailers along the Ingraham Trail near Yellowknife is the focus of a battle over Indigenous land rights.In a case that dates back more than a decade, occupants Agnes Christensen and her son Clayton Christensen say that, as members of the Deninu Kue First Nation of Fort Resolution, N.W.T., they are simply exercising land rights the Crown agreed to when Treaty 8 was signed more than 100 years ago.The territorial government, however, says they're trespassing. It initiated the cou

  • Behind a potential Honda and Nissan tie-up, the existential threat posed by Chinese EVs

    In the case of Honda and Nissan's potential merger, it is mostly defensive as Chinese rivals take the world by storm. While the challenge from China's seemingly boundless EV expertise looms large for all traditional automakers, for Japan it represents a threat to the vast car-manufacturing supply chain that has been the country's economic engine for years. Honda, Japan's second-largest car company, and Nissan, its third-largest, are in talks to deepen ties, including the possibility of setting up a holding company, two people familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.

  • Biathlon official apologizes to Maine native, others who suffered mistreatment

    A woman who grew up in Fort Kent was one of several women who claim U.S. Biathlon officials ignored or excused sexual abuse and harassment by their coaches and others over decades.

  • Canada spent $14.5M fighting First Nations child advocate in court

    Federal governments both Conservative and Liberal spent at least $14.5 million fighting a prominent First Nations child advocate in court over the last 18 years, according to a newly released estimate.The Justice Department says it identified "approximately 19 litigation files" in its electronic system involving Canada and the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, led by executive director Cindy Blackstock, dating back to 2006.Blackstock is a Gitksan social worker, academic and advocate

  • Luxury labels bulk up on lower-priced goods to appeal to middle-class shoppers

    Confronting a broad decline in demand for their usual fare, including $3,000-and-up handbags and $4,000-and-up cashmere jackets, major marketers of designer and luxury merchandise are broadening their product lines to emphasize scarves, belts, wallets and home goods priced at $500 and under. The companies' renewed focus on more affordable products is meant to appeal to middle-class aspirational customers who are more price sensitive, although the strategy may dent companies' typically fat profit margins. After more than two years of sharp price hikes -- with Chanel, Prada and LVMH's Dior raising handbag prices by over 50% in France in 2023 compared to 2020, according to the Wall Street analysts at Bernstein -- luxury labels are finding themselves at risk of alienating the middle class.

  • The PLRA was meant to end frivolous prisoner lawsuits. It's stymied most legitimate Eighth Amendment cases too.

    The Clinton-era law created a separate, unequal justice system for prisoners, placing obstacles in their way before civil rights claims can be heard court.

  • U.S. president-elect Donald Trump spoke at a news conference this week about why he's suing myriad media outlets. In his critics' view, he's trying to scare the media.

    Lock up political critics? Donald Trump is open to it. But his prevailing tactic entering his second term is suing the media into submission.We're not just talking about run-of-the-mill libel lawsuits.We're talking about Trump now suing an Iowa newspaper for a bad poll. And suing the pollster for consumer fraud. He's suing 60 Minutes for how it edited a video — a video he wasn't even part of. He's demanding $10 billion. He's also suing the Pulitzer Prizes for rewarding newspapers that covered his alleged collusion with Russia.This after he sued ABC News for claiming he'd been found liable for rape; in fact, he'd been found liable for sexual abuse, but not rape.A number of media analysts this week expressed shock that ABC's parent company settled the rape-claim case without a trial. The Disney conglomerate paid out $15 million.One global expert on free speech called this a well-worn playbook used in autocratic countries: To sue, sue and keep suing, regardless of whether lawsuits have merit.Winning the suit is almost beside the point, said Eric Heinze. What's key is to keep potential critics terrified of offending you, as it could result in ruinous legal fees."That's how autocrats work," said Heinze, law professor at the University of London, head of the Centre for Law, Democracy and Society, and author of a book about international lessons learned from free speech."Not by telling you how they're going to oppress you, but keeping you unclear about how or whether they will, or when they will. That's the secret of the autocrat. It's not clarity, it's vagueness."The point of chilling the press, he said, is to make it financially risky for people to say things they know are perfectly legal.Trump is seen in 2020 with ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos. ABC's parent company this week agreed to a $15-million settlement because Stephanopoulos used the word 'rape,' rather than 'sexual abuse,' in reference to a court decision against Trump. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)The practice has an acronym: SLAPPThe practice is so widespread it has an acronym: SLAPP, short for Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation. And it's used in all sorts of places, including in democracies by wealthy plaintiffs.Cherian George is from a country notorious for the practice: Singapore. He said defamation cases are part of the ruling party's stock response to public debate. In one famous case, a now-defunct magazine published an interview with an opposition leader who accused Singapore's government of abusing libel lawsuits to conceal corruption. How did the government respond? By suing the magazine for libel.A former journalist, George is now an academic who studies free speech and teaches at Hong Kong Baptist University. He tells his students — who are mostly from mainland China — that a big difference with the U.S. is that, because of how the First Amendment has been interpreted by courts, it's so difficult for politicians to win a defamation case that they rarely even try."I will have to update that lecture," George said.He says a lot will hinge on the willingness of media owners to defend press freedom — the stuff of Hollywood movies, as with The Washington Post's battle to publish a massive leak of documents on the Vietnam War.He called the ABC case a failed test, not the sort of moment Disney will ever want to commemorate in one of its own movies.Profit-driven media owners are vulnerable to this political pressure, he said.Just two days after Disney settled, there was another example of a wealthy media owner scrambling to get on Trump's good side.Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who also happens to own the Washington Post, donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration fund and flew to Mar-a-Lago. During the recent election, he stunned his own newspaper staff by cancelling an editorial that endorsed Trump's opponent Kamala Harris.Trump remarked in a cryptic social-media post Thursday that he's suddenly popular with certain unnamed people, in an all-caps message: "EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE MY FRIEND!!!"Disney's desire to make nice with Trump has drawn ample criticism. NBC host Chuck Todd complained that his ABC peer George Stephanopoulos was abandoned. The anti-Trump conservative news outlet The Bulwark fretted that media will start self-censoring, and stop platforming the hardest-hitting Trump critics.Trump once acknowledged motive for suing mediaBut some reports say the case was more complicated.The New York Post suggested Disney settled to avoid an awkward discovery process, including evidence that Stephanopoulos was warned several times before going on the air to avoid using the word, "rape," then used the word repeatedly.The New York Times said Disney's lawyers were worried the case could go all the way to the Supreme Court and wind up becoming a pretext to weaken First Amendment case law.As it stands, it's extraordinarily difficult for a public figure in the U.S. to sue successfully for libel. Media are protected unless they publish speech that is knowingly malicious and recklessly indifferent to the truth.Trump campaigns in Iowa in 2023. He easily won the state last month. Now he's suing a famous pollster for a survey that showed him behind in the polls. He's also suing the newspaper that ran the poll. (Charlie Neibergall/The Associated Press)It's the legacy of a court case in which the New York Times was sued over a 1960 ad opposing segregation. An Alabama police commissioner said it contained errors and maligned him unfairly, and he was initially awarded $500,000, but the Supreme Court overturned it in New York Times v. Sullivan, the foundation of current U.S. libel law.There have been efforts to challenge it. And a couple of Supreme Court justices, especially Clarence Thomas, support revisiting that 1964 decision.In the meantime, most suits like these get thrown out of court. Trump is on the record explaining, to Heinze's earlier point, that, when it comes to libel suits, winning isn't everything.Trump acknowledged this after suing a journalist in 2006 who questioned his claim of being a billionaire; he sued, lost, and then said it was worth it. "I spent a couple of bucks on legal fees, and they spent a whole lot more," Trump said.  "I did it to make his life miserable, which I'm happy about." He's now aiming to render a few more people's lives difficult. WATCH | Trump hurled insults, threatened to sue columnist during deposition: A summary of Trump's lawsuitsThis includes suing one of the most-respected pollsters in the U.S. under the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act. The reason? A catastrophically bad poll conducted by Ann Selzer, who has since retired after what had been a stellar career.A few days before the November election, she shocked the country with a survey showing Kamala Harris leading in Iowa, a result that pointed to a potential national landslide for her, and it got considerable media attention because of her track record.Trump ultimately won Iowa by 13 points; in his court filing, he said the poll forced his campaign to unnecessarily expend resources in Iowa, and he argued that an error of that magnitude was not statistically possible, but was in fact a malicious act.He's seeking unspecified financial damages from her and is also suing the newspaper that published the survey, the Des Moines Register.That's after Trump sued CBS over 60 Minutes editing clips of an interview with Kamala Harris. The show ran a shortened clip of her grappling with an uncomfortable topic for her: the Middle East. It then resisted calls to publicly release a full interview transcript. He's seeking $10 billion.But CBS denies Trump's accusation of malice. It says it ran one clip of the Harris answer on its show, and shared a different clip from that same answer with another CBS show. He's also suing the Pulitzer Prize board over awards to newspapers for their coverage of his 2016 campaign's alleged collusion with Russia — "the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax," as Trump calls it.The 2016 affair resulted in criminal charges against some of Trump's senior campaign staff and the Pulitzers have defended the awards they gave to the New York Times and Washington Post.In reaction to the pollster lawsuit, Columbia University's free-speech Knight Institute called Trump's effort a non-starter under the First Amendment and urged the court to dismiss it quickly, recognizing it for what it is: An attempt to intimidate and silence.But Trump expressed his full-fledged support for these suits during a media conference this week. In fact, he said, he shouldn't even have to be funding these cases — the U.S. Justice Department should be doing it; in other words, the Justice Department he's about to start leading in one month. "We have to straighten out the press," Trump said.

  • Exclusive-US plans to blacklist company that ordered TSMC chip found in Huawei processor, source says

    The Biden administration plans to blacklist a Chinese company whose TSMC-made chip was illegally incorporated into a Huawei artificial-intelligence processor, according to a person familiar with the matter. The Chinese company, Sophgo, drew attention after a chip found on Huawei's Ascend 910B multi-chip system matched one it ordered from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. Sophgo is the latest Chinese company slated to be punished by the U.S. for helping Huawei.

  • Tariff threats cast a shadow over US reliance on Canada for the majority of its oil imports

    NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. increasingly relies on Canadian crude oil to meet domestic demand and that relationship faces potential strain amid the threat of tariffs from President-elect Donald Trump.

  • Rudy Giuliani ordered back to court to explain why he hasn’t turned over assets to defamed election workers

    America’s Mayor potentially faces severe sanctions with two contempt hearings in January

  • Tencent teams with smartphone maker Honor on AI while Apple searches for a partner

    Chinese technology giant Tencent Holdings announced on Friday a new strategic partnership with smartphone maker Honor for cloud computing and artificial intelligence (AI), giving a boost to a domestic rival to Apple, which has yet to settle on a partner to launch AI on iPhones in the country. Shenzhen-based Tencent said in a post on its official WeChat account that the "long-term collaboration" with Honor, a spin-off smartphone brand from Huawei Technologies, will see the deep integration of its

  • Jay-Z’s lawyer files to dismiss rapper from rape lawsuit. Everything that's happened in the case so far.

    Shawn "Jay-Z" Carter was accused of rape alongside Sean "Diddy" Combs in a lawsuit on Dec. 8. Here's everything that has transpired since.

  • Trump threatens EU with tariffs over oil and gas imports

    The EU already buys the lion's share of U.S. oil and gas exports, according to U.S. government data. No extra volumes are currently available as the United States is exporting at capacity, but Trump has pledged to further grow the country's oil and gas production.